We've all experienced the irritation of a much-loved dress or top shrinking in the wash, coming apart at the seams or fraying at the hem.

Many clothes don’t seem to last for more than a few wears these days, no matter how carefully we look after them.

Yet in our throwaway society, we often accept this lack of longevity as one of those things. After all, we can just go to a High Street shop - or online - and buy a new item for the cost of a cinema ticket.

We've all experienced the irritation of a much-loved dress or top shrinking in the wash, coming apart at the seams or fraying at the hem - so FEMAIL tests some popular brands to see how they hold up

Yet when you splash hundreds on a coat or suit and it meets the same fate, it makes you wonder what’s going on.

The soaring popularity of vintage clothing proves that many garments from the Sixties, Seventies and Eighties have lasted decades.

Today, men’s shirts are designed to last just 30 washes, according to trade association the International Fabricare Institute. Some brands even use impermanence as a selling point - Nike charges £90 for its Mayfly trainers, which were originally designed to fall apart after just 62 miles (100km) of wear.

So what’s changed? One obvious explanation is ‘planned obsolescence’ - a sneaky trick to design garments to wear out, lose shape or fall to pieces easily to force consumers to keep buying replacements.

‘Our grandmothers would buy a coat expecting it to last at least four winters, but because clothing is so much cheaper today, our expectations are lower,’ says brand consultant Tony Glenville, who is also a creative director at the London College of Fashion.

‘That means manufacturers can get away with producing clothing that isn’t well-constructed or finished, meaning its lifespan is often just one season - and sometimes just a single wash.’

Consumers are also to blame. Since the late Nineties, High Street chains have been competing to turn around a far greater number of collections at a much higher speed, feeding our appetite for so-called ‘fast fashion’.

Made from polyester and elastane, this ASOS £45 summery floral dress may feel slightly synthetic, but it’s surprisingly well-made

A recent survey found most fashion purchases are now worn just seven times, with 33 per cent of women considering clothes ‘old’ after a couple of wears.

All this has come at a cost. ‘We’re so used to buying new clothes that we often don’t check the quality - we don’t look at seams or the fabric it’s made from,’ says Tony.

This £59 sweater from Hobbs is made of 57 per cent cotton, 41 per cent viscose, 1 per cent polyamide/nylon and 1 per cent elastane, which will cause problems when washed

And the fabrics we wear today are far less hard-wearing than in the past. Until synthetic materials such as polyester and nylon became popular, virtually all clothes were made of natural materials: wool, cotton, silk and linen.

These are more durable than synthetic and blended fabrics - which is why so many ‘vintage’ pieces have survived.

And it isn’t just the fabric - it’s also the construction. Clothes 50 years ago were simply better made, says Daniel Milford-Cottam, a fashion cataloguer at the V&A.

‘I’m always interested in how the allegedly “badly made” clothing from the Sixties and Seventies is actually very well-made, compared to modern clothing,’ he says

‘People spent more on their clothes in those days, and they were put together properly, with sturdy linings and strong seams.’

Much of the problem stems from the conditions in which modern clothing is made. Most of our purchases are made abroad in factories where workers are paid as little as £1.50 a day.

Driven by the pressure to meet demand, they churn out items, which is reflected in the quality of the construction. This is exacerbated by the fact that in many factories workers toil for 13 or 14 hours a day. No wonder seams are often not finished properly.

Then there are the deliberate tricks to ensure clothing won’t last. ‘There are ways to ensure inbuilt impermanence,’ says Daniel.

Though these J Brand jeans are £95, they don't have any features that make them more durable than cheaper models

These include using inappropriate fabric, or coarse stitching on delicate material, which accelerates the wearing of holes in a garment during washing.

Firms take for granted that modern washing machines are hard on clothes, that most of us use too much detergent and that we seldom check clothing labels carefully.

Many garments are made from a blend of two fabrics, such as cotton and polyester, which shrink differently in the wash, destroying the shape of the clothing.

‘Fastenings are another one,’ says Daniel. ‘You almost never see a button that’s properly sewn on - they’re put on by machine, and the stitching isn’t finished off, so they’re guaranteed to fall off.

Britons have £30 billion worth of clothes in their wardrobes that haven’t been worn for more than a year.

Button-holes are often haphazardly made, which leads to fraying and loose threads. Zips, too, can cause problems, as they are often sewn in crookedly.

‘Overstitching, which is stitching along the edge of fabric to prevent it from fraying, is also rarely finished off in modern clothing - it’s just a running seam that is whipped off the machine at the end,’ says Daniel.

British consumers send 30kg of clothing per head to landfill each year, and because most of our clothing is made from synthetic, petroleum-based fibres, garments we’ve worn a handful of times will take decades to decompose.

Studies also suggest that microfibres - tiny threads shed from synthetic fabric - could be poisoning our waterways and food chain.

So what should we look for when buying clothing? Tony recommends buying fewer items and focusing on natural fabrics such as cotton, wool or linen.

‘Invest in wool and silk and you’ll have an item that can be worn for years,’ he says. ‘Natural fabric is built to last.’

It’s also worth taking the time to properly examine an item before buying. ‘Turn it inside out and check to see if the seams are straight, neat, flat and strong, with no threads coming loose,’ he says. ‘In a poorly made garment, if you gently pull a seam you’ll see a lot of daylight between the stitches. Better quality garments have tighter seams.’

Price is no guarantee of longevity, but some items are worth splashing out on. ‘For something you really want to last, such as a winter coat or a suit for work, it’s worth investing in the highest wool content your budget allows,’ he says.

Avoiding fussy details will also ensure clothes last longer, Tony says. ‘Extra details, such as a part of a garment which is made from different fabric to the rest, or unnecessary zips, will ensure that after a few washes it will start to look scruffy and old or misshapen. Items with clean, classic lines are always the best bet.’

As cheap as a glass of wine, this typifies disposable fashion. ‘It’s fine construction-wise, but it feels and looks cheap,’ says Tony Glenville.  

‘It’s soft, but the tag says, “dry flat” which few people do. I’d guess the neck and the hem start to warp after a while.’  

‘Feels and looks lovely and is well-made,’ says Tony. ‘I think it would last for years if cared for properly.’

‘This dress is 95 per cent viscose, and it’s not immaculately finished, either - its seams don’t look strong. I think it would start to look tired after a few washes.’

‘This is badly designed and constructed. Its lining is 100 per cent polyester, and it’s far too heavy. There are threads hanging from the seams and the stitching is uneven, which will cause breaks over time.’

Made from polyester and elastane, this summery floral dress may feel slightly synthetic, but it’s surprisingly well-made.

‘The seams are overlocked, which prevents fraying, it’s fully lined and the facing — pieces of material sewn at the neck and armholes to strengthen the garment — is substantial,’ says Tony. ‘Its fabric means it would wash well, too.’

 ‘It’s 100 per cent viscose, but well made, with good seams and stitching. It’s a simple design, and when buying inexpensive items, simple is usually best if they are to last.’

‘Nicely made with a proper lining, but the material lets it down,’ says Tony. ‘It’s quite a loose waffle weave, which would look tired after a month of wear.’

This won’t last long, says Tony. ‘It’s 100 per cent viscose and feels likely to shrink. I think its collar will also twist inside after washing, so it will end up an odd shape.’

An office basic - but the price reflects the quality. ‘It’s polyester, viscose and elastane, so although it will wash well, it will go shiny very quickly where it’s been sat on,’ says Tony.

Dry clean only and 100 per cent silk. ‘Pretty, but the stitching inside is crooked — you wouldn’t expect it at that price,’ says Tony. ‘It would be easy to snag — so is only designed to be worn occasionally.’

‘This has an attached lining. It’s beautifully made, with details like a concealed zip and perfect seams.’

A good example of fussy details making it likely not to last, according to Tony. ‘The finish is good, but the blackberry-stitch yoke and hem will quickly get a run in them and because it’s sewn on the bottom, it’s likely to become stretched and misshapen.’

Turn this inside out, and you will see crooked seams held together with large, loose stitches and several threads hanging loose. ‘The hem’s also uneven and the zip doesn’t hang straight. This is going to look awful after a couple of washes,’ says Tony.

Though this feels the softest, it’s made of 57 per cent cotton, 41 per cent viscose, 1 per cent polyamide/nylon and 1 per cent elastane, which will cause problems when washed. ‘The fabric is too complicated, so it will lose its shape quickly,’ says Tony. ‘Not made to last.’

‘These have plenty of elastane to ensure a good fit, lots of firm and strong stitching so they won’t fall apart, and some polyester content so their colour won’t fade too badly - they’re fine,’ says Tony.

Athletic Apparel Men Factory OEM/ODM Products

‘Similarly well-made, though the seams on these are much heavier,’ says Tony. ‘They also have less stretch in the waistband and little in the ankles, so they’d be more difficult to get on.’

Double the price of the Reiss, yet there isn’t much difference in construction,’ says Tony. ‘There is no more stitching, or any features that would make them last any longer than the others.’

The views expressed in the contents above are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of MailOnline.

Yoga Wear, Fitness Leggings, Sport Pants, Women Gym Apparel, Sports Bra - Seejoy,https://www.seejoygroup.com/